Główna zawartość
Kurs: Wi-Phi, czyli filozofia dostępna dla wszystkich > Rozdział 1
Lekcja 2: Błędy logiczne- Fallacies: Formal and Informal Fallacies
- Formal and Informal Fallacies
- Fallacies: Fallacy of Composition
- Fallacies: Fallacy of Division
- Division and Composition
- Fallacies: Introduction to Ad Hominem
- Fallacies: Ad Hominem
- Ad Hominem, Part 1
- Ad Hominem, Part 2
- Fallacies: Affirming the Consequent
- Fallacies: Denying the Antecedent
- Denying the Antecedent and Affirming the Consequent
- Fallacies: Post Hoc Ergo Propter Hoc
- Post Hoc Ergo Propter Hoc
- Fallacies: Appeal to the People
- Fallacies: Begging the Question
- Begging the Question
- Fallacies: Equivocation
- Fallacies: Straw Man Fallacy
- Fallacies: Slippery Slope
- Fallacies: Red Herring
© 2024 Khan AcademyWarunki użytkowaniapolitykę prywatnościInformacja o plikach cookie
Fallacies: Denying the Antecedent
In this video, Matthew C. Harris explains the fallacy of denying the antecedent, the formal fallacy that arises from inferring the inverse of a conditional statement. He also explains why graduate students might also be humans.
Speaker: Matthew C. Harris, Duke University. Stworzone przez: Gaurav Vazirani.
Speaker: Matthew C. Harris, Duke University. Stworzone przez: Gaurav Vazirani.
Chcesz dołączyć do dyskusji?
Na razie brak głosów w dyskusji