0 punktów energii
Uczysz się do testu? Skorzystaj z tych 5 lekcji na temat Alkany, cykloalkany i grupy funkcyjne.
Zobacz 5 lekcji

# Conformational analysis of ethane

Transkrypcja filmu video (w języku angielskim)
- [Voiceover] Here we have the eclipsed confirmation of ethane, and if I turn it so we sight down the carbon carbon bond, we'll see the Newman projection for the eclipsed confirmation. Notice I have some hydrogens in green here, and that's just to help us visualize rotation around the carbon carbon bond. So I'm going to rotate the front carbon and keep the back carbon stationary. So now we get the staggered confirmation of ethane. I'm gonna keep rotating 60 degrees. So I'm gonna rotate again, and now we have an eclipsed confirmation. I rotate again, and now we have a staggered confirmation of ethane. I rotate another 60 degrees, and we get an eclipsed confirmation. I rotate again, and we get a staggered, and you get the idea. One more rotation, and we get back to an eclipsed confirmation. Here we have a graph of the potential energies of the confirmations that we just saw in the video. So we started out right here with this eclipsed confirmation of ethane, so we are at this particular potential energy. As we rotate to get to this staggered confirmation, you can see there's a decrease in potential energy. So this staggered confirmation has a lower potential energy than the eclipsed confirmation. We rotate again, we get back up here to this eclipsed confirmation. Notice that takes energy. So it takes energy to go from this staggered confirmation to this eclipsed confirmation. Going from the eclipsed to the staggered, that's a decrease in energy. Going from staggered up to this eclipsed, that's an increase in energy. Going from the eclipsed down to the staggered again is a decrease, and finally, back to the original eclipsed confirmation would be an increase in energy. Notice that all of our eclipsed confirmations here have the same potential energy. If I draw a line, this is all the same potential energy. Whoops, I didn't draw a very nice line there, but you get the idea. Therefore, we say that these are degenerate in terms of energy. Same thing for the staggered confirmations. All of these staggered confirmations, if I draw a line in here, have the same potential energy. So the staggered confirmations are lower in energy than the eclipsed confirmations. Actually, the difference is 12 kilojoules per mole. So if I write that in here, so 12 kilojoules per mole, that's talking about the difference in energy between the eclipsed confirmations and the staggered confirmations. Lower in energy means more stable. The easy way of thinking about that is imagine these things as hills, if I have a boulder, or a rock, or something down here at the bottom of the hill and I'm comparing that boulder or rock up here to a boulder at the top of the hill. In physics, you can set your potential energy equal to zero at the ground. So let's say that this is ground level. I say my potential energy, U, is equal to zero joules at this point. And so the boulder in this valley here, let's say it's 10 joules. Let's say this is 10 joules here at this point. And then it would take energy to push this boulder up this hill to this point. Let's say the final potential energy of the boulder at this point would be 22 joules. It takes energy in order to do that. This final position is less stable, and this is the higher potential energy. So higher in potential energy means less stable. Lower in potential energy means more stable. So why do we have a difference in energy between the staggered and the eclipsed confirmation? Well this is called torsional strain. So this difference in energy, this 12 kilojoules per mole, is called torsional strain. The source of torsional strain has been a topic of debate. One of the current theories has to do with molecular orbital theory. I'm gonna go with one of the older ones, which talks about the electron pair repulsions. The electron pair repulsions are greatest when the bonds are eclipsed. So if you think about the electrons in this bond being close to the electrons in this bond, and you have that same thing over here and over here, so in space, these electron pairs, these bonding electron pairs are closer together in the eclipsed confirmation than they are in the staggered. If I go down here to the staggered, you can see if you're thinking about these electron pairs they're relatively further away than they are in the eclipsed confirmation. We know that electrons will repel. So electron pair repulsions are greatest when the bonds are eclipsed, and therefore, that's higher energy and the electron pairs are further away from each other when you're talking about staggered, therefore, more stable. The total energy cost between the two confirmations is 12 kilojoules per mole. We have three pairs of eclipsed hydrogens. If I go back up to here, here's one pair of eclipsed hydrogens, here's another pair, and here's another pair. So if the total energy is 12 kilojoules per mole, and I have three pairs of eclipsed hydrogens, we could say that the energy cost for each pair of eclipsed hydrogens is four kilojoules per mole. So this would be four kilojoules per mole for this pair of eclipsed hydrogens, four kilojoules per mole for this one, and four kilojoules per mole for this one, adding up for a total of 12. So our total energy cost is 12, and now we can think about two hydrogens eclipsing each other as having an energy cost of four kilojoules per mole. We've just seen that the staggered confirmation of ethane is more stable than the eclipsed confirmation of ethane. If you want turn a staggered confirmation into an eclipsed confirmation, you would need energy. At room temperature, there's enough energy for the staggered confirmation to turn into the eclipsed. Equilibrium is reached between the two confirmations, and at room temperature, approximately 99% of ethane molecules have an approximately staggered confirmation, whereas only about 1% have an eclipsed confirmation. Again, that's due to stability. Staggered is more stable than eclipsed.